Private Acts: The Acrobat Sublime photos

Private Acts: The Acrobat Sublime photos

Private Acts: The Acrobat Sublime

Photography collides with gravity-defying acts in this sensual and mesmerizing collection of photographs that capture the explosive energy and beauty of bodies. In this extraordinary suite of images by Acey Harper, the energy and beauty of nude female and male bodies-devoid of costumes, greasepaint, stage sets, and lighting-are photographed stripped bare (figuratively and literally), revealing the acrobats’ art, craft, and emotions. The beautiful, well-trained, and highly flexible bodies are captured in settings from the natural (beaches in the Marin Headlands, forests in Vermont, the Black Rock Desert) to the gritty urban (a New Jersey steel mill, San Francisco streets, the New York subway).
In three captivating essays, Harriet Heyman, well-schooled in trapeze arts, describes firsthand what it feels like to train as an acrobat and what motivates these dedicated artists.

About the Author

Harriet Heyman’s work has appeared in The New York Times, Life, Architectural Digest, and House & Garden. Acey Harper is an award-winning photographer for National Geographic, People, Sports Illustrated, and Time. He has served as director of photography on two Day in the Life books.

Private Acts

Harriet Heyman, Ac…

 

Flickr photo-sharing Galleries

Flickr adds new photo-sharing idea: Galleries

Flickr galleries let members ‘curate’ a presentation of up to 18 photos and videos.

(Credit: Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET) Flickr galleries let members collect and 'curate' a presentation of up to 18 photos and videos.

Flickr galleries let members ‘curate’ a presentation of up to 18 photos and videos.

(Credit: Screenshot by Stephen Shankland/CNET)

September 14, 2009 by Stephen Shankland found at news.cnet.com

Flickr has added a new feature called galleries to showcase photos–and this time not just your own shots.

Galleries, announced on Monday, lets Flickr members assemble collections of up to 18 photos. The photos are shown on the page along with the gallery curator’s comments.

Flickr has a reason for the 18-image limit: it wants to emphasize quality, not quantity.

“While it might seem like an arbitrary number, we want to give our members an opportunity to engage in activity that is similar to what a curator of a gallery or museum might undertake,” the company said on its gallery FAQ site. “Even a sprawling retrospective of a genre or specific artist wouldn’t include every single piece of work available. A curator takes the time to choose a selection of artwork that together becomes something in itself.”

Unfortunately, Galleries does not lift one limit I see for Flickr. It’s good for sharing photos with others, but not so good for assembling multiple members’ photos from group events–say, a family’s photos from a vacation or attendees’ photos of a wedding.

That use seems well-aligned with Flickr’s vision. As a half-measure, Flickr users can create unusual tags to link photos from multiple people, but that’s kind of nerdy, doesn’t offer a lot of control over presentation, and is open to problems with other people using the same tag.

Of course, a member might have concerns about having his or her photos included in somebody else’s gallery. But Flickr provides a mechanism to remove a photo from a specific gallery and a preference setting to keep a user’s photos out of galleries in general.

Overall, the idea of Galleries reinforces some of the social and exploratory aspects of Flickr that help it rise above just a place to stick your photos online. I just hope that the average folks out there can figure out the distinction between Flickr’s sets, collections, galleries, and photo streams. Heaven forbid they add albums to the mix.

Stephen Shankland writes about a wide range of technology and products, but has a particular focus on browsers and digital photography.
 

The icons of photography auction

The icons of photography
PARIS – It starts with images from Nadar’s workshop and Sicilian peasants by Von Gloeden. It continues with engineering works by Baldus, industrial views by Margaret Bourke-White and Germaine Krull, advertising still lives by Emmanuel Sougez and François Kollar, beautiful portraits by Denise Colomb and Inge Morath, landscapes by Lucien Hervé, Le Corbusier’s faithful companion… And others by Boubat, Halsman, Dennis Stock. In short, a glance at some great classics representing more than a century of photography. Whether it is period prints or posthumo us ones, the prices vary between 1 000 and 2 000 euros except for a Giacometti taken by Cartier-Bresson or the geometric compositions by Aaron Siskind, that could go for more than 5 000 euros.

  • Photographie at Richelieu-Drouot (SVV Le Mouel) on 6 May 2009 at 2 PM.
  • Browse the catalogue

     

    THE SUBLIME FINE ART OF A FASHION PHOTOGRAPHER

    THE SUBLIME FINE ART OF A FASHION PHOTOGRAPHER

    Thai lenswoman of the moment talks about her ascent to the top.

    By: Onsiri Pravattiyagul
    Published: 14/03/2009 found at bangkokpost.com

    Chutharut Pornmuneesoonthorn won’t get a job as a hairdresser anytime soon. Her latest hair handiwork graces itself in contrast to the new cut of her decade long boyfriend Jakkapong “Song” Siririn, the bassist of Paradox known for his crazy stunts and cross-dressing costumes. The supposed-to-be-straight ear-length bob is lopsided, and looks like more of a zig zag than a line. Maybe it’s an intentional attempt to complement Jakkapong’s famed eccentric yet amicable behaviour, but, as bad as it might sound, the cut is definitely of street fashion material. He teases her about it, but is adamant she doesn’t change or fix it.

     

    fashion photography

    Not that Chutharut needs to attend a beauty school to become a hair stylist to mark her place in the world when she’s already been the toast of the photography community for quite some times now. Among the glittering sea of straight- and gay-male-dominated fashion photography world, Chutharut stands firmly, proudly and deservedly among the top of the top. She has been as much in demand as other household names, and her work can be spotted in high-end-magazine editorial shoots as well as hip fashion house catalogues from Sretsis to Greyhound.

    Petite and laid back, Chutharut speaks at a slower pace with the slightest changes in tone and volume, but she cracks jokes with a deadpan face followed by a tiny smile. Set against the loud rambunctious world of clothes and bitchiness she inhabits, Chutharut, with a surprisingly reserved exterior and subdued manner, is somehow an oddball yin in the chaotic world of yang; a slower walker in the fast moving world, but equally as erratic, as you can see in her photos.

    Her works are also of a peculiar nature as they call for further contemplation rather than force feeding their fashion message. Every picture with Chutharut’s stamp on it transpires to be awe-inspiring and thought provoking. That’s how Chutharut works her flowing magic – accidental beauty being captured through a keen eye and fine craftswomanship. Her works command attention and repeated viewings with their cool, collected subtleness combined with well-hidden edges and a shadowy sense of weirdness – the kinds of pictures that leave lasting impressions rather than instant but fleeting shock and awe; high fashion at its most creative. But don’t ask Chutharut to pigeonhole her style, for it will leave the pint-size lenswoman flabbergasted for a long while.

     

    sublime-fashion-photo2

    “I can’t answer this question,” she said, pausing for a long time. “I don’t know how I differ from others because I don’t know their working processes well enough to compare them with my own. My thought process goes back and forth all the time, and what I aim to achieve is to ignite further ideas in people. They don’t even have to have the same ideas, but just to think. Then again, I guess I’m already happy when people remember my works,” she said.

    Chutharut grew up in a small, dry Isan province called Chaiyapum. Her fascination with cameras began during childhood.

    “My elder siblings are quite a bit older than me. When I was kid, I had a chance to see their cameras, which they used for school, but they never allowed me to touch them. So I told myself I would get my own camera one day,” she said.

    Following her siblings, she moved to Bangkok during grade 10, and later gained admission to study art education at Chulalongkorn University. The teaching work experience with second graders prompted her to steer away from a teaching career. Chutharut took photography classes as electives and fell in love with the craft.

    “I couldn’t get enough of it. I was never bored when taking classes. I knew I liked it very much, and I could do this as a living. I made up my mind that I wanted to make photography my career,” Chutharut said.

    sublime-fashion-photography-3Regularly honing her skills by randomly shooting and building up a portfolio, Chutharut landed a job as a photographer upon graduation at the short lived Freeze magazine. She brushed aside the comment that her portfolio must have been strong to be chosen right out of school and added: “Oh, the editor was my senior at Chulalongkorn.” Freeze lasted for only two issues, but Chutharut fondly recalled how much she learned under the helm of the now famous, award winning music video director, Kamolchanok Somjaipeng, who was the photography editor. She said she got so many chances to learn from him as he granted her many opportunities to try out her skills, giving her advice along the way. It was also at Freeze that she met her most prominent mentor, the preeminent Grand Dame of fashion and photography Punsiri Siriwetchapun.

    “I assisted him in one shoot for the magazine, and I really liked his working style and his works. I was, and still am, in awe of him, you could say. So when Freeze called it quits, I asked to intern for him, and he said yes. I learned so much from him. I think Punsiri was born to teach and to give. He doesn’t hog knowledge, and he’s very generous. When one of his assistants quit, I got the job. He taught me a lot – from techniques to people skills to contact management. I used to steal his polaroids, keeping them in a scrap book, noting his different techniques and things,” she said.

    After almost two years with Punsiri, Chutharut decided to further her studies in London where she gained a diploma in fashion, styling and photography at the London College of Fashion. The London years, she said, helped her find her own voice and her own way as well as thought organisation and confidence when it comes to fashion photography. When she returned to Bangkok in 2001, she landed herself jobs through her stronger portfolio. It was as if she floated out and breezed right back in without having to try that much considering how tough it normally is to get commissions from top fashion magazines. The works truly spoke for themselves as well as the aid of lady luck so it seemed.

    “Yeah, everything just fell into place. I don’t know why,” she said.

    Being one of very few females – if not the only – at the pinnacle of photography among her male counterparts is not something that Chutharut concerns herself with.

    “I feel indifferent being a girl in this job. I don’t think about it. But actually, being female sometimes gives you different perspectives and, yes, female intuition comes into play too. I can’t shoot for men’s mags because my definition of ‘sexiness’ and theirs are totally different. I tried before and it didn’t work at all,” she said.

    To Chutharut, fashion photography is purely about style, and it’s up to those behind the lens to make it more interesting and profound. She has dabbled in art exhibitions and VDO arts, and is keen to explore these realms further, but remains adamant that fashion and fashion photography are as creative as it comes.

    “Fashion is fine art. They go together. Photos from the pages of Vogue or other magazines have been put in big, important galleries. Even if we deal with fashion, we can capture personal, cultural, political and social elements too. It has been done plenty of times. There’s more to it than pretty things or coolness. That’s the point I’d like to get across,” she said.

     

    ‘Americans’: The Sublime Book That Changed Photography

    the Americans sublime photo book at Amazon:

    The Americans
     

    Robert Frank as photographed by Allen Ginsberg
     

     

     
    Rodeo—New York City, 1954

     

    Cover of the,

    To mark The Americans’ 50th anniversary, the National Gallery of Art has created an exhibition and published a new edition, entitled Looking In.

     All Things Considered, February 14, 2009 · There are few single works of art that have changed the direction of their medium. In 1959, one book dramatically altered how photographers looked through their viewfinders and the way Americans saw themselves.

    The Americans was the work of Swiss-born photographer Robert Frank, and the National Gallery of Art is celebrating the 50th anniversary of the book’s American debut with an exhibition. Curator Sarah Greenough says The Americans was actually reviled when it was first published in the United States.

    Popular Photography asked a number of writers to critique the book and almost all of them were very negative,” Greenough says. “It was described as a sad poem by a very sick person.”

    A Different Look At America

    The Americans showed a different America than the wholesome, nonconfrontational photo essays offered in some popular magazines. Frank’s subjects weren’t necessarily living the American dream of the 1950s: They were factory workers in Detroit, transvestites in New York, black passengers on a segregated trolley in New Orleans. Frank didn’t even get much support from the art world, he recalls.

    “The Museum of Modern Art wouldn’t even sell the book,” Frank says. “But the younger people caught on.”

    “I’d never seen anything like it,” photographer Ed Ruscha says. “Robert Frank came out here and he just showed that you could see the USA until you spit blood.”

    Joel Meyerowitz, a pioneer of color photography, was also inspired. “It was the vision that emanated from the book that led not only me, but my whole generation of photographers out into the American landscape in a sense — the lunatic sublime of America,” he says.

    ‘The Americans’ Began In New York

    Robert Frank came to New York in 1947. Born in Zurich in 1924 and trained in photography, he was eager to escape his father’s radio-importing business. On his first day in New York, his sponsor took him to get a bite to eat.

    “We sat down — it was a table for two,” Frank recalls. “The waiter came and he just threw the knives and the forks on the table. It absolutely impressed me. I said, ‘Boy, this is something!’”

    Frank honed his skills working as a commercial photographer. He disliked the work, but it was a way to make a living. Meyerowitz met him on one of these jobs. At the time, Meyerowitz was the art director at a small advertising agency and didn’t even own a camera. He was sent to watch Frank shoot photos for a booklet Meyerowitz was to design.

    “It was such a magical experience watching him twisting and turning, bobbing, weaving,” Meyerowitz remembers. “Every time I heard his Leica go click, I would see the moment freeze in front of Robert.”

    Meyerowitz returned to the office, walked up to his boss and quit his job.

    “And he said, ‘What do you mean you’re quitting?’” Meyerowitz recalls. “I said, ‘I saw this guy take photographs. I want to be a photographer. I want to go out in the street and take photographs of life.’”

    Frank spent his time off wandering New York and photographing what he found. “Like a boxer trains for a fight,” Frank says, a photographer needs to practice by getting out and taking pictures every day. “It doesn’t matter how many he takes or if he takes any at all. It gets you prepared to know what you should take pictures of or what is the right thing to do and when.”

    Frank’s American Road Trip

    Frank’s noncommercial work started to get noticed. In 1954, he applied for a Guggenheim fellowship proposing to create an “observation and record of what one naturalized American finds to see in the United States.” Photographic legends Walker Evans and Edward Steichen wrote references. Frank got the grant, bought a used Ford and headed out.

    “I was absolutely free just to turn left or turn right without knowing what I would find.”

    He set off in June 1955. His first stops were in Pennsylvania and Ohio, then Michigan, where he was allowed to photograph inside Ford’s River Rouge plant in Dearborn.

    “It was so hot and the noise and the machines. And then the workers would see me and for some reason they all started to scream. [It was] just a release,” Frank laughs.

    His photograph of the factory is a grainy blur: two lines of men at work, blacks and whites side-by-side and facing each other across the assembly line that runs up the middle of the picture.

    There were some hairy moments. In Arkansas, Frank was stopped by state police “for no other reason than that he was a foreign-looking person driving an older car,” Greenough says. “When the police stopped him, he didn’t speak with a good southern accent.” He was jailed and interrogated for several hours.

    “He described it as one of the most terrifying experiences of his trip,” she says.

    Frank was a foreigner with a bunch of cameras at the height of the Cold War. Police thought he was a spy. In a way, he was.

    During his trip, Frank shot 767 rolls of film yielding about 27,000 images. He edited that down to about 1,000 work prints, spread them across the floor of his studio and tacked them to the walls for a final edit. Out of a year and a half of work, Frank chose just 83 images.

    Frank doesn’t like to go back and analyze them. But he will talk about one of his favorites, a private moment on a hill in San Francisco. At the top of the frame is a broad gray sky; below are the city’s hills and houses in stark white. In the foreground, sitting on a hill overlooking the scene, is a couple, the man turned to the camera with an angry scowl on his face. The invisible photographer had been caught.

    “All I could do is just stand there with my camera and just keep photographing, but a little bit away from him so he could think and accept that maybe I photographed the panorama of the city,” Frank remembers.

    “Those are the difficult moments every photographer has to get over and get away with it and not be discouraged,” he says. “Because if one is sensitive, it has an effect on you. So maybe it’s better not to be sensitive as a photographer and just go on. Many photographers today have that but I never had that. I think it’s nice to be sensitive as a photographer and maybe it’s harder.”

    Frank rarely spoke to his subjects; he chose to point, shoot and move along. His pictures, however, eventually struck an emotional chord. The Americans became a hit as the ’50s gave way to the ’60s. Americans began to see his photographs as relevant — even prescient. But by then, Frank had already moved on. The year The Americans came out, he set aside still photography and made his first film.

    ———-

    Buy the Americans sublime photo book at Amazon (or click on the book below):

    The Americans
     

    comments:

    Leonard  Chianese (ldchian)

    Leonard Chianese (ldchian) wrote:

    i was a photographer for about ten years starting in the mid 70s. i was kicked out of a restaurant for wearing a camera around my neck. some people were more intimidated when i pointed my nikon at them than if were aiming a gun. down at the college, some young women wanted to undo their shirts.

    “Those . . . difficult moments every photographer has to get over and get away with” that mr. frank refers to are the ones that connect photographers together.

    and this article connected us to one of the best.

    maandag 16 februari 2009 19:11:29

     
    MiMi Agnew (MiMi5749)

    MiMi Agnew (MiMi5749) wrote:

    Time well captured.BEAUTIFUL!Simply BeaUtiFul…..

    maandag 16 februari 2009 16:17:23

    George Gekas (Laika57)

    George Gekas (Laika57) wrote:

    Home late, up late, house is cold, waiting for hearth, clicking through mean chatter one by one, thinking back to martini conversation, skimming on voices and vision, only to conclude life indeed stops momentarily and forever for those who see…Robert Frank was this gift.

    Thank you NPR

    zondag 15 februari 2009 13:15:04

     
    Kally Samuels (Kally)

    Kally Samuels (Kally) wrote:

    I must have this book! I cried when I read what he said about his work. But I have a question about a difference between the written and spoken piece. In the article, I find Tom Cole’s words: “In the foreground, sitting on a hill overlooking the scene, is a couple, the man turned to the camera with an angry scowl on his face. The invisible photographer had been caught.” When I listened to the piece to hear the photographer’s voice – I had fallen in love again with some thought in my head and wanted more of this balding man, who had such eyes and who sat in a drab studio – I was startled to hear Mr. Cole describe the couple as “black.” That is what the couple was, after all. But I had not noticed that particluar description in the written work. I went back to see if I had missed something. But it was as I had thought. Why was this word edited out? What was the editor thinking? Was he sensitive, too?

    zondag 15 februari 2009 12:59:33

    Guy Simpson (Draftcowboy)

    Guy Simpson (Draftcowboy) wrote:

    I find the closed mindedness of people, like the state trooper in Arkansas, shocking. I hope we have come passed that point, but in some quarters I don’t think we have.